[kahljorn]

What I don't get is why you can't just take what he posts and develop your own opinions without asking him for his opinion(el blanco did that to the 9/11 commission report thing and look how much better the argument developed, there were actual responses :O). His opinion and the facts are seperate. Most of everything else was me just acting like you guys.
Instead you have him pull some "Opinion" out of his ass that you were satisfied with wherein which the "Opinion" was 1/32nd of the post he made, whereas the other part was what he has learned from news sources. Do you know how I know this? Because I know that he wasn't standing there with dick cheney. Did you read any of the reports he classified as relevant?

Did you read the opinion/discrepancy you stated as satisfying? Didn't el blanco tear it apart in something like five minutes? And that satisfied you that you knew that he knew what he was talking about? And somehow I'm the bad guy between you two. Hilarity.

So after he satisfied you with that did you go back and read everything he's posted? Or even read the post he made in this thread wherein "Officials" commented on the 9/11 incident? Just curious.

"How I spotted this amongst that mountain of rambling insanity, I'll never know."

PROBABLY BECAUSE IT WAS AT THE END OF IT, USUALLY YOU REMEMBER THE END OF THINGS BECAUSE THATS WHERE YOU STOP DOING THEM.

I have to admit el blanco has the most solid position between you two as a redundant asshole. I'm not even sure most of the time if el blanco is talking out of his ass, were there really 14 jets to defend the united states? Did he actually refute what geggy said? This mystery will always stand. However, most of it seemed to make sense to me.

And it's not necessarily in this instance that i belive there's some conspiracy theory. The conspiracy theory to me is the fact that something bad happened and information is withheld and distorted, causing a war and bad political atmosphere- right? that's bad. See, I agree entirely that it's a fuck up or something funny's going on with big discrepancies like this, except to me they serve the same purpose, because regardless of if you have a fuck up in office or someone fucking people over that person needs to be removed from office.
You see, regardless of what happened, to me, the situation needs to be accessed to see if that's deserving. That's how logical and reasonable people deal with things, because you don't want fuck ups and fuck overs in responsible positions, you don't want anything but the normal kind of fucks. Procreative fucks. It's natural and healthy.
I think in light of the evidences there is some room for feeling that way. We tried to impeach somebody for getting a blow job and then lying about it.