|
|
|
say what now?
|
 |
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Peebody
|
|
Sep 21st, 2006, 06:41 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Grislygus
Allright, I picked a fight with kahljorn over the subject and was completely wiped out, so I don't have the credibility to back up objections, but still, this caught my eye.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Geggy
It was not what went down on 9/11, but the mean, motives, opportunity and the length the bush admin had gone to cover it up that convinced me it was an inside jobby. Who seem to have gain the most from the attacks? The bush administration. If it wasn't for the attacks, where would they be now? What would they have as an invocation to further their agenda?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Matthew Rothschild
...if the Bush Administration plotters carried out 9/11 to justify attacking Iraq, why didn't they have Iraqi hijackers do the deed? In actuality, there was not a single Iraqi hijacker, and Bush propagandists had to do all sorts of gymnastics to link Iraq to the actual attackers.
|
That's a very, very good point. |
I think they've already tried linking saddam to al qaeda but they found no evidence for that although cheney and rice are still aggressively asserting that there is connection even after the senate released memo there are simply none. I guess there are no iraqis in the us manufactured al qaeda terrorist network | |
__________________
enjoy now, regret later
| |
|
|