[Preechr]

There's good reason behind a desire for what blind partisans would call deadlock, Max. One thing Kevin and I agree wholeheartedly on is that the supposedly liberal party really SHOULD be behind the war on terror, for very Liberal reasons. Unfortunately, ending slavery and oppression fall a distant second... third, maybe... to retaining political power for Pelosi's modern Democrats. It's called a "unity government." There's a lot of historical precedence in times of war, and having one has generally led our country to wartime success. Israel and Britain, too, in fact.

It would be nice (for me, of course.... not you) to see a Democrat Party that could bring itself to rally behind something more than the current "whatever they say is e-e-e-e-e-e-evil, racist and WRONG." When TeamBUSH© says the Democrats have no plan for victory, they're RIGHT. When I think progressive, I think the Democrats should be winning this war for America rather than sitting around bitching about it.