[Abcdxxxx]

Burbank, you're a child. Your attempt at word play is silly and contrarian. I'd suggest you read your own last post, and then reread the article that started this post, and see if you can't figure out on your own what a turnip you sound like.

In the meantime, I'll indulge your schizoprenia long enough to say, It's not our job to sort out the "thems" from the "not thems". That's for Muslims and Arabs to decide, as a matter of their own self interest. I'd like to assume the majority view themselves in the not them category, but they're reluctant to make that distinction too. The largest Muslim organizations in the world have alligned themselves in the "them" category. That puts them in much greater danger for collateral killing. By the way, where are Muslims being collaterally killed by Americans because they're Muslim? Now back up a second. Do you know what else puts Muslims in collateral danger of being killed? The game of pretending there isn't one single islamic movement which has culminated in the climate outlined in the article we're supposedly discussing. By whitewashing the situation or attempting to turn the guilt back towards the United States you are in effect responsible for the continued abuse of innocent Muslims by Muslims themselves. Collateral killing? Try Darfur. Try any of the incidents being reported daily involving Islamic violence....

...and if you don't disagree, there's no reason to respond , Burbank.