Quote:
Originally Posted by Preechr
Well, that's as close as you came to pointing out a specific lie. The Joe Wilson thing was, as kahljorn alluded to, the infamous "sixteen words," which has been entirely digested. British Intelligence sources truly did and still do believe Iraq had been attempting to attain yellowcake from sources in Africa.
As for "Bush's" big WMD lie, nearly everyone you've ever heard of that can speak with any authority at all can be quoted at that time as to knowing with almost 100% certainty that Saddam wasn't abiding with the various agreements he'd signed, at that he probably had and was making more WMD material.
|
Oh yeah britain are colluding with the US in a fight against terrorism which seem to have benefit some of the british government insiders as well as the formers, ie. Ex-prime minister John Major who has investment in Carlyle, so probably a bad example. True saddam did possessed WMD before dumping them 10 years prior to the invasion, and the us govt has the receipt to prove that they sold the wumds to saddam but why do they continue to insist the public and sex up the intel that he has wmd despite CIA's intelligence findings that there are no evidence saddam has wmd or even attempted to aquire yellowcakes from nigeria? They either didn't believe the findings or ignored the intel. But it doesn't make any difference, they needed a way to invade iraq anyhow.
Quote:
|
Tone down the windmill tilting for a minute and take a stab at clearly illuminating one specific lie told by George W. Bush, Geggy. Try it. I'm trying to help you sound like less of a fruitcake here. This is called the process substantiation.
|
I thought I already did. Bush claims that the us govt have continued to change tactics in Iraq over the time when there are clearly no evidence they've ever tried to change tactics.