[kahljorn]

Kevin was saying that, just because she's a woman and "Different" than all of the other preidents we've had in a relatively meaningless way, doesn't mean she will make a good president. Being a woman doesn't necessitate being a good president or anything good or interesting happening. The same applies to men.

There has been, and still are, female leaders of other countries so I don't really see it as a big deal. Women are just people like everyone else ;/

Personally, if the entire matter of Hilary Clinton becoming president is, "Oh man it's a woman how cool that's different than we are used to lets vote for her," i really hope she doesn't get into office because that's basically a sensational non-rational reason to vote for someone to become the leader of the country.
It's like how people voted for Bush because of his "Morality."

I found an interesting article while i was researching for a paper that said over 40%, it might have been 60%, of the people who voted for president bush didn't even know what he stood for on various political topics. DEMOCRACY IN ACTION!!!!!!!


Also I find the entire concept of this thread, unless it's supposed to be uh satirical or something, to be ridiculous. A new era, because of a female president? Usually I associate eras with more meaningful differences ;/