View Single Post
  #2  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Apr 19th, 2007, 06:48 PM       
"but I think there should be implemented some way to identify both the origin of sale and the weapon of discharge of each weapon by the bullet alone"

I don't think that would be possible without shooting the gun before it is sold, but I don't know very much about guns.


Registration has never solved a crime? I think that's a lie. And it could be easily proven, I'm sure. let's say there's a MURDER and it was done with a glock and the husband just so happens to own a glock that can't be found in the house anywhere. Suddenly you have a good reason to suspect the husband! And that's just an obvious example. I don't know if they are looking for some situation where the convicting evidence was absolutely related to the registration of the gun or what but it seems ridiculous to think that, just because it hasn't been the convicting evidence, that gun registration hasn't helped in law enforcement at all.
Why would the NRA care that who owns what is registered? lol. That doesn't make any sense. Is it because they think it will cut into their profits?
Even cars are registered.
Reply With Quote