Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesman
I'm obviously speaking about when the GC runs its course, and the X-Box2 and PS3 are out.
Besides, the graphics that the PS2 can produce aren't as bad as people like to play them up as. But that's beside the point.
The point is, Nintendo game products have not lived up to both consumer and business expectations, and developers are once again shying away from making exclusive titles for Nintendo. Long story short: If Nintendo keeps on the way they are, you're basically buying a Nintendo system to play Nintendo games, and nothing else. They'd be better off cutting out the system part, and making their money as a third-party developer and merchandising.
|
I get a subscription to GameInformer magazine, and they mentioned that Nintendo has a new system lined up to hit the market at least one year before the other graphics do. I think Gamecube is a great system, and the titles they have out now are pretty cool, but that Zelda that they scrapped, from the screenshots, would have been fucking great.
As for the Nintendo games on X-Box and PS2, I don't think it would work. The point is that PS2 does have pretty bad graphics. Dreamcast came out I think 2 years before it, and still has better graphics. I look for a system with great games, and Nintendo always suits me. Besides, most of Sega's games are terrible, I think that is why it didn't launch in the market like PS2 did.
I have no intention of buying PS3. The Playstation name will be all washed up by then, and it still won't even have the graphics of most of the systems out today.