|  | 
| 
| Antagonistic Tyrannosaur |  
|  |  | 
Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: The Abstruse Caboose 
      |  | | 
			
			 
			
				Jul 16th, 2008, 11:22 PM
			
			
			
		
			
			       
				
			
			 
 Well, the way you describe it, it doesn't sound like an ultrasound at all.  Ultrasounds are just that--they operate on detecting response patterns from induced reverberations.  Unless the physics to ultrasound has gone waaaaaay more advanced than I thought possible, then I doubt that's what it was.  For one thing, ultrasound scans are done in such a way that allows you to watch real-time movement (very superfluous for detecting a chemical anomaly in an organ of any type) and for another thing, I don't think that it's plausible that acoustic analysis could be made on ultrasounds without a wand-like device touching your body.
 So, I would guess that it was either an MRI or a PET scan.  If it were an MRI, the IV injection would have been a contrast solution that your gallbladder would be adept to pick up and would make their desired image either more or less sensitive to the magnetic field.  If it were a PET scan, the injection would have been a metabolic compound that contains an isotope with a very short half-life so that your gallbladder would start emitting anti-matter and the scan detectors could produce an image from the resulting gamma rays that shoot out of you.
 
 When I learned about how PET scans work, I got the impression that medical imaging physicists have a pretty base disregard for human life but have a morbid curiosity of how they can figure out what is going wrong with the human body.  I'm just waiting for the statistically inevitable day when a doctor says, "well, you didn't have cancer BEFORE the scan..."
 
 It's MY BODY, it's MY CHOICE.  I don't want positrons in MY BODY reacting with MY valence electrons.
 |  | 
				__________________ SETH ME IMPRIMI FECIT
 |  |  | 
 |