Quote:
Originally Posted by Chojin
HFCS has the same exact nutritional content as sugar.
Its chemical compound is not "completely different". It is "slightly different but pretty much the same".
|
So the compound
is different. As the name would state. I've been noticing your using a lot of words like "
Slightly, somewhat, kinda, etc", this does not help your argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chojin
HFCS is not any more dangerous than sugar.
Its negative side effects are trace and negligible.
|
Unfortunately HFCS is the culprit to numerous serious diseases.
These articles are everywhere and they all say the same thing. Is this a huge conspiracy against HFCS? Or is it just a blatant reality?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chojin
HFCS isn't responsible for obesity because the only way you can get HFCS in your system in the first place is by eating junk. No one is to blame for you eating junk but yourself.
|
If people aren't educated how do they know what is good for them? Most people just buy the cheapest stuff and believe they are eating the right things and now everything says natural on it so how are they supposed to know what is really good for them if they are being lied to at every turn?
also this....
This is a good one.