[The_Rorschach]

Just for note, I do know the law, and I stand by my previous statements. I think he butted heads on a similar issue in the past when we were discussing the Robber Barons, so I won't bother repeating an old argument, but I will say this:

If I owned a house, and invested into its property value through landscaping, restoration and buying furnishings and fixtures to make it more attractive, I would be in the right. If, after having done these things, I found I had too little time to upkeep my investment due to my work schedule, and I hired someone to do the yardwork and housework, I would still be in the right. Now if I wanted expressly a French Maid and a Scottish groundskeeper, why would I be in the wrong? It's my house, and my money going into their pockets. Why must I placate the first minority who applies if I do not desire them?

People are not entitled to work, they are not entitled to jobs. They are entitled to certains rights, which the law cannot curtail, and certain liberties the law can restrict. They cannot, however, demand placement, and it is folly for society to think they can.