Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zero Signal
...HE PRETTY MUCH KNEW WHERE THEY WERE BEING HIDDEN, BEFORE THE INVASION EVEN STARTED.
|
Pretty much? Yep. There are and were in Iraq. That
"pretty much" narrows it down. Are you saying you would have supported the war IF Bush would have drawn you a map to the exact locations of some WMDs and shown you some pictures of Saddam Hussein posing next to a bunch of barrels clearly marked "VX" and "Anthrax Spores?" How long do you think might be a sufficient amount of time to find the "smoking gun" now that no one is actively moving them around and actively deceiving those that would look for clues?
As for not owing anyone any apologies... are you not one of those people bitching about any American activity in Iraq on the basis that Bush knowingly LIED to the world? You are telling me that we should all just ignore you? That once you are proven wrong on this, you'll be perfectly fine just moving on to the next thing you wish to raise hell about? We shouldn't even consider your opinion as possibly truthful or even well-considered?
I don't know you, as I am new here. That's why I'm asking these questions. If you have established a reputation as a partisan that will say ANYTHING to serve some anti-this or that agenda, then I'm sorry for engaging you at all. Generally speaking, failing to make accurate predictions, especially one as risky as predicting that the President of the US blatantly LIED to the world just so he could get his rocks off playing General, just because you can't see through the walls of your own colon would count against your credibility. If you have none anyway, I guess no apology would be necessary after all...