View Single Post
  #11  
pjalne pjalne is offline
Mocker
pjalne's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Norway
pjalne is probably a spambot
Old Jul 4th, 2003, 06:10 AM       
VINCE

I want to ask you a couple of questions here and I'll be as clear as possible.

You recently defined a good Christian. Not only is there nothing in the Bible or, as far as I know, in the Catholic dogma that backs up your definition of a Christian, this definition also sounds more like a breed of atomic supermen than anything else. I would like to know how you can criticize everyone else and sentence them to hell for not literally following the Bible while you yourself have redefined the Bible until it no longer resembles anything from the belief system you claim to be a part of.

Furthermore, I want to ask you why you were compelled to define a good Christian as everything you are not. I will, as I have said before, give you that you have willpower, but so does Saddam. Willpower is not a genetic trait exclusive to Christians. You also say that Christians are intelligent and tactful. These, again, are not traits exclusive to Christians, and they also are attributes that do not in any way apply to yourself. I could go on forever and still not convince you you are a moron, but even you have to see that you have no tact. You are in fact the very embodyment of tactlessness. You blurt out a constant firework of ignorant insults and unfounded and highly inaccuratre accusations.

To make this easy for you, I have condensed the paragraphs above to simple questions:

1: Why are you in a position to redefine the meaning of the word 'Christian'?

2: Why would you define a good Christian as the opposite of yourself?

I think these are reasonable questions, and I ask you to answer them as well as you can. I have tried to make everything crystal clear, but if you feel I'm being vague anywhere please do not hesitate to ask me to explain further. To make this even easier for you, I will also list the two possible directions you can take when answering:

A: Crushing my points with though-out and well-founded arguments.

B: Admitting you were wrong.

To make this EVEN EASIER STILL, I will now list other directions you can take. I will accept any as the following as forms of alternative B:

B.1: Calling me names.

B.2: Telling me to go fuck myself.

B.3: Telling me to come fuck you.

B.4: Writing a sentence that is not a sentence at all, hoping everyone will give you the benefit of doubt.

B.5: Giving answers that completely fail to apply to the original questions.

B.6: Telling me you've got better things to do than hanging around with losers and then go ahead and post vomit in 40 other threads.

B.7: Refraining from answering at all.

What do you say?

EDIT: I would like to add that if you should admit the stupidity in your outburst, there will be no victory dance. The only thing that will come from me in this hypothetical scenario is a teensy weensy bit of respect. I'm sure you wouldn't give a fuck about the respect of anyone on this board, but that's all I have to offer.
__________________
Encyclopedia Obscura
Reply With Quote