Quote:
|
I think it was a no brainer to assume the US would start making plans to topple Iraq the day a second Bush was sworn into office.
|
Maybe it was a no brainer, but that doesn't make it right.
Quote:
|
The Iraq to 9/11 links are only as suspect as the Bin Laden to 9/11 link announced only hours after the event happened.
|
Bin Laden had declared war on America, and was also a top operative for one of the largest terror networks in the world. This makes him more of a likely target, IMO.
Quote:
|
Again it's a no brainer. Saddam was involved with terrorist groups, and had been linked to prior attempts on the WTC. Why not question it the day after?
|
Question, no problem. Declare a factual link? Big problem.
Quote:
|
Wasn't it Clinton who was the first to say Saddam had WMD???
|
Eeverybody said it and meant it prior to 1998. But that was then, this is now, and things change.....
Quote:
|
I think the best argument is that we know Saddam had WMD because WE sold them to him!!!!! Wasn't that a popular leftist damning America argument at one point?
|
It was a popular argument when discussing the gassing of the Kurds. It's relevant in that context, it isn't relevant in 2003 when you consider that bio-weapons have a certain shelf life under ideal conditions.