[Sethomas]

Vox, that website didn't refute any of the points I made. It doesn't make sense to say that all the blood was ink, because a biological examination of the blood was done in the first place confirming it to be human type A/B. Blood doesn't always dry the same color, it depends on one's level of iron. That article didn't even touch the issue of the negative imagery, which is a huge fucking deal. It says that the blood shouldn't have flowed downwards, which ignores the fact that it would have stopped flowing at all shortly after death. And still, that article claims it is the product of the 14th century. Look at any example of 14th century art and try to convince me that painting methodology existed to portray facial depth as seen in the image. Accurate portrayal of the face didn't come about until the late 1400s, and it took even longer to hit France.

Being such an extreme historical anomaly, saying that the Shroud is a fake requires no less faith than saying it's real.