|
BANNED
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
|
|

Aug 15th, 2003, 06:12 PM
"And for Kahl......you are an odd odd man......an odd salt lickin'.....freak talkin'......strange strange man."
I'm no man! and why didn't anyone respond to perception magic?
"To state that God can be proven or disproven empirically is a fallacy. Empiricism relies on the scientific method and is intrinsically linked to science"
What a moron, how can you state that when your original point states God can't be proven or Disproven, you are relying on a lack of facts. You are using that lack of facts to somehow make your point stronger, which is what you might call ignorance. You don't know if it can be proven or disproven, and you don't know if it could not be proven or disproven. As the same eternal paradox stretches outward(and ironically inward) with that single reflection of NO FACTS.
"as the supernatural would fall outside the realm of the physical universe."
Earthquakes used to be considered Supernatural. Lightning could still be considered Supernatural by what we know of it.
As for existentialism, it kind of denies the concept of Nihilism. What if you only exist for the depravity of another person, technically if God created you and he is omnipotent and omnipresent, then he is you. So you are not you but God, as is everyone else. Saying I exist is a state of individual incarnation and realization, but by means of Christian statements and many other religions you can determine you are not really "I" but "everyone" equavically bringing you to the point you don't exist as yourself, but only as a stone left for someone to trip on.
"I think therefore I am" basically states that everyone around you thinks, and that rocks can think(which brings you to nihilism-- if it were said t hat rocks dont think and they are only there cause your thinking makes them there-- which would more likely be that you are the product of another persons imagination than the opposing element), which refutes all scientific knowledge, since this is a scientific discussion of sorts(or at least that's how it seems) you have to conclude existentialism is merely supernatural and must be excused, with the lack of existentialism most of this argument must be assumed supernatural, and all knowledge can thusly be concluded "Fallacy". Point in case. Candy is great. Floom.
|
__________________
NEVER
|
|
|