|  | 
| 
| xXxASPERGERSxXx |  
|  |  |  |  | | 
			
			 
			
				Aug 15th, 2003, 09:14 PM
			
			
			
		
			
			       
				
			
			 
 Scientific method that comes to a hard conclusion. But not just that. I would need to know what people mean by god. To believe in something I need to at least have an idea of what it is. 
 I don't bring up god. I respond to posts which bring up god. God would obviously fall into the classification of the world of the unprovable and undisprovable/metaphysical/ and religious. Unless he doesn't, which was one of the big issues of my initial post.
 
 I do see what you mean by your language comment and I see what your saying. Its a valid point, but it assumes that there is a god and that it just can't be conveyed.
 
 But I find it bitterly ironic that at the moment I have mentally reached a standstill as I cannot think of any way to convey to you my thoughts on the topic I initially wished to discuss. Maybe I'm just sleepy. I wish I could start this over.
 
 Chapwire: Cool article. And ya. Thats a big trump card right there. heh.
 |  |  |  |  | 
 |