Thread: WikiLeaks
View Single Post
  #238  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Dec 22nd, 2010, 04:04 PM       
oh yea.. i edited out the part about riots, but i was just bringing that up to point out why that you can't publicize/say whatever you want.

Quote:
Child pornography is a bit of a different story. Its flat out illegal no matter who has it or where its displayed.
so are guberment secrets that can harm the nation if displayed, apparantly :O

Quote:
"We are going to hack <government or corporate entity> next Wednesday by way of DoS."
Isn't that what 4chan basically did in response to this? thought i saw guitar woman or someone mention that

Quote:
SHIELD Act
In response to the actions of Julian Assange and his organization, U.S. Senators Joe Lieberman, John Ensign, and Scott Brown "introduced a bill to amend the Espionage Act in order to facilitate the prosecution of folks like Wikileaks."[31] This legislation, known as the SHIELD Act, "would make it illegal to publish the names of U.S. military and intelligence informants."[32] Critics have noted that "[l]eaking [classified] information in the first place is already a crime, so the measure is aimed squarely at publishers," and that "Lieberman’s proposed solution to WikiLeaks could have implications for journalists reporting on some of the more unsavory practices of the intelligence community."[33]
Interesting that they want to modify the law specifically for the Julian Asshinge thing. Does that mean wikileaks leaked the names of US Military and Intelligence informants?
__________________
NEVER
Reply With Quote