Quote:
Originally Posted by soundtest
Sorry, I can't play this line by line game of forum tennis. It's tedious.
|
Oh well, your problem, not mine.
Quote:
|
The whole first part can be addressed by: "one day or not, he's still earned more money than the others" and "he's still polling higher than Thompson who is getting coverage".
|
On what poll? Would you mind, you know, proving your statements?
Quote:
|
For your "no debate" I suggest you re-read that link I posted. Paul's campaign is still complaining that he's not invited - there is no scheduling conflict.
|
There is also no debate, please read the link I posted once.
Quote:
If you believe that your candidates are not being decided for you by your media, you are naive. As for your "look how well other fringe candidates like Paul did", here's a possible reason why:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyvVQYf6XWk
|
Oh, please. Nader just didn't appeal to the vast majority of voters. There is no damn corporate conglomerate shutting out candidates. How the hell did Perot actually make it into debates?
Quote:
|
As for not seeing a reason to vote for Kucinich: ok?
|
That wouldn't be a good reason.
Quote:
|
The rest of the world has given up on you all to make rational decisions long ago.
|
Glad you can speak for over 5 billion people. I guess the rest of the world doesn't do rational thinking all that well either if you are their chosen representative.
You'll have to pardon me if I am going to address the concerns of myself and my family before I pick the candidate thats best for the countries trying to compete with us.
Quote:
|
Part of me hopes Giuliani or Huckabee gets in for more of the same so I can sit back and watch the trainwreck.
|
You know, if you had just come out and said you are a douchebag, you would have saved us both some time.
Russia? The country with the dwindling population?
And China is still learning about the dangers of lead paint. not too concerned there.