[mburbank]

Hebe should be capitalized. And you're right. It was nice. The rest of your comment just seemed forced. Sorry, Ronnie is still more repulsive than you right now.

Jeanette. He'll never do more than Post 'free speech' because he is constitutionally unable to admit he's wrong. I responded to his witless charge more than once, even demonstrating that I personally view free speech to be more important than the seperation of church and state and that while personally I think it would be a poor idea, I would support the legal right to prayer in school as long as all and any prayer were allowed. Naldo got all confused and asked us to believe he would support Satanist prayer in school if there were Satanist students.

Ronnies take on Jesus was that "He was not into Politics". I said this put him at Odds with W, and posted multiple sources, which did indeed view the (and report) the quote differently, but all agreed that Bush had meant he saw Jesus as his favorite Political philosipher. PEGGY NOONAN, a complete W psycophant, is on public record as thinking that's what he meant and chalking it up to poor debating skills. As if I hadn't done enough work for Ronnie, I then finally found and posted an article with actual verbatim text and the order of who said what. I offered him multiple interpretations, I even went so far as to include one that would allow Ronnie to save face with Bush taking the question as being about thought in general as opposed to political thought. Not only did I not get a thank you for doing his research for him, I didn't even get a response. He'd already decided his answer to the question was that I hadn't given him anything to answer. He hasn't even weighed in on what he thinks W thinks, or what he himself thinks, let alone if there's a disagreement there. Pretty stubborn coming from a man who claims to be open to questions.

"I didn't write the article. Not my words"
I think we all agree there. The question is, why did you post it? Your current answer "Just bringing the news to I-mockery" is ridiculous. You chose to post it, this choice surely shows something as it was not a random selection, and you don't have the strength of character to comment because it might reveal something about you as a person. But you'll just say "I didn't write the article. Not my words" and pretend you think it's a response.

"Sorry Max, Justice is a good thing and I hope to see more. "
Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't realized you just meant generic Justice as opposed to the welts shown in those photos. And you were just sort of randomly commenting out of context on your love of justice and not supporting the execution of justice by an armed police force as opposed to the judiciary. 'Cause that would be, you know, hating something America stands for. I apologize for misunderstanding you. I'm sure it has nothing to do with you either horrendously mistating your case, backpeddling or just being a very heartless, uncaring person.

"I'm only going by your own words. "

I'm sorry, Nalds, which word would those be speciffically? I mean, I hate to ask you to do some work, but in context, IE me disliking you for who you are as opposed to some poor sportsmanship regarding war, what words are you thinking of here? Espcially since my dislike of you predates the war. Come up with an example. Unless you're lying.

"Or posting that stupid ass nonexistant submarine letter."
-Me

"I don't know what you're talking about."
-Naldo

Big shock. Of course, you would if you
A.) Read this message board instead of just posting on it.
or
B.) Read the paragraph you took that quote from and parsed the meaning from it by using the verbs and subjects.
or
C.) Had a sense of humor more developed than a Marine Gelly.


And Proto. I knew you'd get my joke. It was for you. Heart eyes pulsing emoticon.