[ziggytrix]

Blowing up a building with civillians and terrorists in it is a bit different than blowing up a whole city because there are terrorists somewhere in it, isn't it?

You gotta draw a line somewhere. Mine just happens to be before turning cities into minefields or leaving behind poisonous clouds that could blow into anyone's territory. Getting exasperated and doing as much damage as we possibly can in the hope that we hit some terrorists would be a sign we aren't winning the war on terror, in my opinion.

Take out the enemy where you find them - sure, that much is a given. But you guys who are defending Israel's alleged use of these cluster bombs - would you have supported Israel if they had just nuked Tyre? I'm just curious. Is there a concept of going too far when the enemy is "terror"?

If not, then let's just blow up the whole planet. That would teach those terrorists there is NOWHERE they can hide. Who's with me?