Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
imported_I, fuzzbot. imported_I, fuzzbot. is offline
Senior Member
imported_I, fuzzbot.'s Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: I win hearts by saving lives
imported_I, fuzzbot. is probably a spambot
Old Feb 3rd, 2005, 06:03 PM        Saying employers "exploit" employees is asinine
Two different definitions of exploitation are implicit, simultaneously, in such discussions...

1) The first is that i exploit you if i benefit from your existence

in the sense, i hope to exploit my signifigant other, and she hopes to exploit me (as with any relationship...the same goes for friendship)

We both hope to benefit by the others relationship to us...otherwise, we wouldn't be in the relationship as there would be nothing to gain by being so.... if that is the definiton of exploitation we are using, then that is why humans are social animals and not solitary ones (like cats)....

Let's say we own a house and rent out a room to some individuals who are enthusiastic gardeners. and we are not. we get free gardening, they get free use of a yard to garden in.. who is exploiting who?

2) The second definiton is that i exploit you if i gain and you lose by our association.

The connection between the two can be made either by claiming that the world is a zero-sum game in which one person can only gain at anothers expense, or by arguing that if i gain by our association you deserve to have the gain given to you, so my refusal to do so injures you....

The first argument is implausible. the second has a very curious asymmetry... if i give you all the gain, you have now gained by our association and should give it all back. and this would continue on and on from one back to another....

One can see that employees definately gain by working for an employer. they leverage their labor for money, trading leisure for monetary gain.

By deciding to work for a given wage, the employee is literally making the decision that this time/labor he trades is equal to the payment he receives....otherwise, he would trade his time/labor elsewhere...
__________________
I was reading a rather droll bio on Elvis Presley and read that he polypharmed, and I think that Polly Pharmer would make a great pen name.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.