Quote:
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by theapportioner
					
				 
				
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by KevinTheOmnivore
					
				 
				If you're getting at some kind of compulsory service, not necessarily military in nature, well I'd be down with that. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 Sounds like a good idea, although I'm not sure how one'd go about implementing it on a mass scale.  Knowing our government, we'd probably end up "volunteering" for companies like Monsanto or Merck.  
			
		 | 
	
	
 I'm not sure why I'm responding to this now, but I read the thread again, and became interested.
Anyway, regarding the infrastructure for national service, well it's already there. Like I said, AmeriCorps is already set up, as is the PeaceCorps and TFA. I served for a year with AmeriCorps, and I loved it. I learned a lot in that year.
The problem with AmeriCorps is that it is constantly under attack from the anti-govt. crowd. Sometimes with good reason, because some AmeriCorps programs are quite worthless. But usually they just hate it b/c "you shouldn't get paid to volunteer." And Clinton created it, so there ya go. There was a good book on the passage of the National Service Act called "The Bill." 
So anyway, the ground work is potentially there, if we were so inclined.