Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > General Blabber
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Mar 2nd, 2005, 09:45 AM       
I'm a big fan of crude humor, but only if it's done well, and the cruder it is, the harder that is.

The problem I think, is that for a lot of folks, humor is largely about recognition, and people know you laugh when someone farts or curses. Comedians in training rely heavily on cheap laughs, and it's no suprise. It can be awful out there and knowing you can get a laugh by saying "I MEAN, WHAT THE FUCK, HUH?" is a huge relief.

The other thing to take into account is historical context. A lot of the things you're thinking of in Animal house and KFM had never been done before, and now they're almost a requirement. You can't see a comedy movie that doesn't ave fart jokes in it. It's not allowed, it's totally the law. It's the exact opposite of breaking a taboo, which is what made it funny the first time. On the other hand, I can think of a South park where they made a fart joke over and over and over, and to me that was funny because by running it into the ground they're illustrating how required it is. Terrence and Philip is funny to me because someone who doesn't like South park wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

I guess what it bils down to, for me, is intention and skill. What did they mean to do with the crude joke, and how well did they execute it.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.