Cheney contradicts Osama's 9/11 involvement

[ranxer]

yea spectre, surely it was steel that was molten in the rubble, the scientists i've heard have stated that there should not be molten anything in the building unless there was an explosive like thermite that burns through metal, there are some folks still analyzing the debris that was flying out and saying that the preliminary results are that the metal was burning as it came down.. burning molten steel, a collapse doesnt fit that evidence.

anyway your and ziggys questions and points are somewhat plausible but the evidence seems conclusive to me. still, the questions yall have about it are difficult to brush aside especially with the mounds of disinformation out there. for every source i find that states what i have come to believe as facts, there are an almost equal number stating that the hijackers pulled it off by themselves.

I'm waiting on pins and needles for some new evidence from scientists and whistleblowers to come out.. I've heard that there is some steel from the structures being analyzed that should make headlines if conclusive. Dr. Steven Jones is a physicist and he says that after his analysis, there's no way that the towers fell from the planes hitting them, i read the paper, I'm convinced, but i fail to explain it to others that convincingly..

we need more physicists, engineers, demolition experts and pilots that are beyond reproach to tip the balance.