Perhaps just saying terrorism is too pc of me. I think the debate is between those who see vilent, radical Islam as a problem worth fighting, and those who just don't think it's a big deal (or worse, think it's all our fault that they hate us).
This doesn't mean we need to kill all arabs, "stop islam", or whatever other ridiculous responses this discussion will result in. People can think and believewhatever they want. You wanna hate the West? Awesome. You don't like Jews? Super. But the message must be sent that if you act out on those impulses violently, or if another state supports those actions, then you will be stopped. Your freedom to be ignorant and hateful stops at my nose, so to speak.
This is the crucial debate in my mind. I think this is what the Democrats are thinking:
