Our terrorists

[mburbank]

Oh, so now you're an unimpeachable source?

You've 'explained it to me', so I have to value your take over ABC news? See, I just thought you'd made statements.

Listen, It's not that I hold television news in such high esteem. It's that I think your analysis of events is plagued by tunnel vision. In addition, If I felt moved enough to delve into ABC's website, I might even find descriptions of staff, previsious work and methodology that could lend a little credence to their reporting. Admittedly, only a little, but since you at every opportunity have refused to pony up even a shred of info on what gives you your near God like infallability, for now I'll take the ABC everybody knows over the abc known for posting at I-mockery.

Forgive me. It's probably my blind, knee jerk hatred of you and not the fact that you're not an actual news outlet, but just some annonymous guy with a hard on for typing.

Not that this means the ABC that people sometimes pay attention to is right and the abc poised lovingly over the reflecting pool isn't right. That could well be. I'm just not inclined to see you as a 'source'. Maybe if you were less shy about whatever professorial chairs you hold and all. Until then, I 'encourage' you to site, or quote sources.

I'm not sure how the fact that they are a sub group of Al-Quaeda or that they are banned by Pakistan and Iraq impacts the article, or my point, which is that we are happy to work with 'evil doers' as long as the 'evil' they are 'doing' coincides with our interests. Somehow I missed the relevance of your 'explanation'.


Now you type "Whatever", add some poorly concieved insult and insist as always that someone needs to 'look up' what you tell them to and that when they do they will automatically come to the same conclusions you did, because people hold opinions, but Pope abc reveals The Word.