|
Slim Goodbody
|
 |
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: More like DIEwan
|
|

May 22nd, 2007, 03:35 PM
All of that stuff seemed to be what made 28 days awesome. It wasn't constant bombardment, it was subtle, tasteful. In the first movie they were pretty much there for atmosphere than the central focus of the movie. The camera work is another things that made the first movie totally awesome, it was exciting, made you feel more absorbed into the movie, and made the initial "jump" factor last through the scene. All your complaints as to why this movie sucks could really be applied to the first movie as well. Other than the storyline.
Because it wasn't exactly what you expected or wanted doesn't mean it is going to be bad. Here's the thing, I fucking HATE how it isn't a survival movie and is now a military-type post-apocolyptic drama. I wanted it to be a suspensful survival movie again, where you never feel safe. But that won't ruin the movie for me. Everyone I trust who has seen it, loves it. And they were all very big loyal fans of the first like me. So I'm optimistic.
|
__________________
"Quote from some guy I think is funny."
-Some guy I think is funny
|
|
|