Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Movies & Television
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
O71394658 O71394658 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: A theater near you
O71394658 is probably a spambot
Old Aug 27th, 2003, 10:37 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinTheHerbivore
I'll admit that his data is often exaggerated, but the assault upon the film is likewise exaggerated. I've gone through that entire diatribe indicting him of...whatever, and a lot of it is petty, minor, and doesn't change the crux or the substance of his argument (now, the question then is should a true, er, "documentarian" ???, actually HAVE an argument....maybe not).
I disagree. Some of his most convincing points and critical assertations in the movie were based upon lies or gross exaggerations. Every part of that movie was in one way falsified, exaggerated, or severely edited in relation to reality. The fact that you claim they are "minor" (which they aren't) removes any credibility one may have of him. The fact that he is lying on such subtle fronts only makes you wonder what he did to the big picture.
__________________
Do not click here.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.