Quote:
Logic dictates that if evolutionism is true and the eye was built incrementally over time from nothing to its present state of functional wholeness, then it must have at some point in the past been only half of an eye.
Only a moment's thought on this supposed ancestral eye lets us see that there would be problems: How would this eye be moved in its socket if it wasn't a smooth spherical shape? What would stop the seepage of light through the top? How would the lens keep from being deformed if it was not held equally on all sides? How would the eye jelly have kept from spilling out of the opened bowl of the half-eye?
|
LOL
This is a creation scientist mocking the ridiculous assertions of "evolutionists" - he is being completely sincere. I used to think these fundamentalists were just a little nuts. Now I know they're absolutely stupid. There are a thousand different ways I could make fun of this article, but none of them is really necessary in the face of the utter, almost painful idiocy of the whole thing.
The people on this website just lowered my average opinion of humans by about 5%.
Hybrid Mode
