Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Feb 17th, 2004, 07:00 PM       
W got no honeymoon in the election, and had none coming. A contested election where the winner had less than half the votes doesn't get you a honeymoon. Soon after, 9/11. My personal opinion is it rescued his presidency.

The respect he was given vsa vis unwarranted criticism was a mark of American Character, and I think the office of the President warranted it. The absence of warranted criticism was a honeymoon. Are you suggesting his performance was perfect?

I have problems with the administration, the congress and the press. I think the latter two gave W. a huge benefit of the dooubt during a time of crisis. I think he abused that trust. I think congress and the press abdicatted their responsability to the nation by giving him such free reign. I have problems with the way the adminsitration used that free reign.

"The Congress and the Senate saw the same exact intelligence that the president saw."
That may be a true statement. However, the adminsitration implied over and over that they knew things they couldn't reveal for national security reasons. The feeling among many conf=gressman was that the administration HAD to have solid info or they wouldn't e doing what they were doing. Again, an abdication of responsability and an abuse of trust.

"Whether or not you agree with The Patriot Act is a whole seperate issue. It sounds like your argument here is with Congress, not Bush."

Congress abdicatted responsability passing legislation they hadn't read. The administration abused trust at a time of national tragedy by writting such a piece of abussive, unamerican tripe.

"Well, his approval rating was in the mid 80's so I don't think your complaint is really with the media here.....it's with the American people."

If by media, you mean US magazine, then I suppose theirs a connection beytween aproval ratings and reporting. I think journalism ought to be held more closely to standards connected to truth. I don't wish to make a comparison between the two leaders, but Hitler had a hell of a high approval rating for quite a while. Popularity and reality often walk seperate paths. When the media is cowed by popularity, the abdicate responsability. When a President takes advanage of a cowed media, he abuses the nations trust.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:08 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.