|
|
|
|
May 27th, 2004, 11:29 AM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mburbank
First of all, and I should have said this in the other thread too, congratulations on sourcing an actual newspaper. The Herald is the right wing pper here in my town, but it's deffinitely a Newspaper and while I don't like it as much as the globe, they follow basic journalistic guidelines.
Kerry is doing a lot to piss of the locals. Actually, it' not so much what he's doing as what he isn't. Contrary to popular belief the decision to shut down the city of Boston was not made by the DNC, it was made by th secret service, the ame folks who are leaving NYC up and running. But his Campaign has a decidely 'let them eat cake' attitude, advising commuters to 'just take the week off if you need to'. Unfortunately, most of us are not employed by the Kerry campaign.
I understand the inclination to fight the 'Bush Money Machine', but if this election is for sale it's over already. That's why we have one person, one vote instead of handing the presidency to the candidate who raises the most green.
Kerry's worst mistake is in making his concideration of the issue public, which means whatever he does, he's already lost ground. It's sad and frustrating tat he's doing such a bad job.
All of that being said, I think it's pretty clear who's a partisan flake, Nalds. I see the human being I'm voting for, and I know he's not the person I want, he's just the best person vailable to me. You see a heroic crusader running against terrorist sympathisers. And if that's not how you see it, you describe the two candidates for me.
|
Wow, a dumbfuck liberal tool likes a whiny liberal paper. Sky is still blue. | |
| |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
