Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
theapportioner theapportioner is offline
Mocker
theapportioner's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
theapportioner is probably a spambot
Old Mar 25th, 2005, 02:28 PM       
Related topics:

Does depriving someone of food and water in this situation constitute 'withholding medical treatment'?

Is it 'suicide' (even if suicide by proxy)? How is it different from say, deciding not to get chemo for an aggressive, metastatic cancer?

Given that, do you think a quick, active euthanasia is more 'humane' than this type of passive euthanasia? What do you think is the better idea?

I think most people here agree that patients should have the right to decide whether they want treatment withheld.

Michael Schiavo has been accused of acting under his own self-interest. But couldn't you say the same about Terri's parents? Their motive may be 'love' but it's still their self-interest.

I just want to remind you that involuntary, passive euthanasia is done every day, everywhere.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.