Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
theapportioner theapportioner is offline
Mocker
theapportioner's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
theapportioner is probably a spambot
Old Mar 26th, 2005, 02:10 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinTheOmnivore
But ABC is right in my opinion. This case is pretty important, because it raises every states legal guardianship into question. It forces us to have these sort of uncomfortable conversations, where we begin to draw the lines of what does and doesn't classify as a human being. Yours is different from mine, we know that much.
The way it's generally set up, with strict levels determining next of kin and guardianship, is flawed perhaps but also necessary. Decisions regarding involuntary passive euthanasia are made all the time. Usually the person is going to die soon anyway. If the guardianship levels are not clear, then it becomes so messy for so many people.

Everyone keeps saying that the Terry Schiavo situation is a "special" case. I hardly see why.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.