|
|
|
=======
|
| |
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NA
|
|
Jun 15th, 2005, 02:09 PM
I don't know... It's pretty hard to dispute the opinions of a chief economist from the Labor Dept. Those guys have been heavily involved in the 9/11 investigations since the attacks occurred, haven't they?
Personally, I feel the idea of explosives pre-existing within the WTC helping with the demolition is pretty much inside the realm of that which is obvious at this point. That's not to say anyone other than terrorists are to blame. "Controlled Demolition?" That's funny.
| |
__________________
mburbank~ Yes, okay, fine, I do know what you meant, but why is it not possible for you to get through a paragraph without making all the words cry?
How can someone who obviously thinks so much of their ideas have so little respect for expressing them? How can someone who so yearns to be taken seriously make so little effort?!
| |
|
|
Threaded Mode