Quote:
|
Originally Posted by adept_ninja
so you are gay?
|
I is asexual in the sense of being unattracted to humans, yet certain objects and certain acts, are capable of exciting arousal in me : to give but one example, acts of dermographism. This is a sexual fetish. I only acquired it, or, or any rate, I only noticed I had it, a couple of years ago ; and it is only to-day that I have discovered that there exists a term for it. I thought I was unique in this fetish, but there being a term for it, I think it is safe to infer that there are others with it. However, I is romantically attracted to humans; just not sexually. I has no animal passions to speak of.
Anyway, back on topic.
I have come to this conclusion: What we habitually call sexual 'love' (love between a man and a woman or two homosexuals, etc.) is not love. What we habitually call motherly love is not love. True love is a congeries of all 'loves' directed at single object. Brotherly 'love', motherly 'love', fatherly 'love', grandfatherly 'love', friendlily 'love', girlfriendily 'love'--all directed at the same individual. And it must not and cannot be sexual.
I could never kiss a man on the neck. Sick. Their necks are usually hairy or whiskery. I would kiss those deformed freaks of nature we euphemistically call 'women' (as if they were somehow derived from men--how flattering to them!) before kissing a man on the neck!
It is an affected whimper. Women are masochists; they derive sexual pleasure from being submissive and making sounds associated with the submissive and acting like a submissive child. They are self-centred and narcissistic. It is not simply being kissed which pleases them ; it is their own submissive 'whimperings' etc which 'turn them on.' They probably do not 'whimper' when they masturbate; they only do it when men are watching or trying to 'please' them.
:/
Threaded Mode