Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Oct 8th, 2005, 08:22 PM       
"Every biological agent used for attacking people, or stored for later use is either a nature disease (like flinging rotting cows over castle walls, Hitler's pipedream bubonic plague bomb, or smallpox infected blankets given to the Indians) or an enhanced version of a current disease, like what some said Saddam's Dr. "Germ" was working on. "

"Why make a new disease when you have plenty of perfectly good ones already?"

Are you arguing with yourself? [i]It wasn't a new 'disease', it was a combination of old 'diseases' that turned into a new 'disease'[i]. The reason they'd do that would probably be to make it harder to cure? Maybe so they could already have the vaccination prepared ahead of time that they could keep secret..? Maybe so nobody would've ever heard of it or be able to easily isolate it? Maybe so it would grow faster, be more deadly and capable of rapid evolution? Stuff like that would be my guess.
Let's not step outside of the box though, we better continue using shitty biological agents. I mean, why not, we are frozen in time aren't we?
Anthrax is a disease.

"Now, when you look at the theory of it being used in an atgtack... one what? It came from Africa. Who sees a political enemy in a larger population of poor Africans who are dying of malnutrition anyway?"

Obviously you didn't go and read it even after you asked for references or you'd know the answer of that, fucko. This just shows that you are arguing from an even more shallow position than I am. Perhaps some of what you're saying has merit, but most of what you're saying is fucking ridiculous. How much bigger do you think the world is now than 1,000 years ago? Not double, the population has probably doubled in the last decade. No, the idea is that as the population gets bigger and bigger things get.. bigger. Get it? The word bigger? Now you see, the earth has only a set amount of square mileage. Human beings however continue to grow, and let's say the world population doubled every five years while the size of the earth stays the same. After a certain point the population growth would get ridiculous. Pure speculation, though, the earth continues to grow in size and fertility every year.
I think the Reference details exactly what the estimated population growth rate is.
The reason they used it in africa was to test it. Yea, nobody cares about Africa. That's exactly the point. Who knows, maybe they planned it so that it would come over here and infect the "Ghetto" or something. I didn't have any hand in this conspiracy, I must say.
But chances are rich people don't want to be infected. They want poor people to infected.
Also, what is in africa? I mean, besides some place we're fighting a war near that has alot of oil, and other natural resources including nice farm soil and who knows what else. Why would they attack africa? Why are they attacking iraq? I don't get it. Africa holds absolutely no interest to people. There's no companies or businesses there, no industry... none. The only thing that's there is poor people, like you said. Who are wasting so much land that could do the american nation a great deal of good...? i don't know, that's possible.
I think culling back entire poor civilizations is an easy way to gain some profit. Some of those countries policy is to keep people poor and make yourself rich, isn't it? The disease would probably flourish better in a poor enviroment as diseases have a habit of doing. Without the poor people the countries would be alot weaker(which would make us stronger). I don't know, again, I'm speculating. The african continent is also connected to asia, and europe.
However, the thing you are arguing but haven't bothered to research or read is out there with all the details for you to argue about.
Quit trying to argue with me, though. You can't, really, because i don't really give a shit if it's true or not, nor do i even believe or disbelieve it.
However, if you have his 'qualifications' why don't you look at his data, the part where he shows how the lamb chicken and cow virus were combined and prove it wrong scientifically. I mean, again, the scientific data is out there awaiting you, it's not just some crazy conspiracy theory. The guy was a doctor after all, and submitted his findings before the un.
Unless of course this guy was never alive.

Again, the end clarification:
All the shit you're talking about is in the reference i gave you. Quit trying to argue me about it, go read it. I'm not going to sit here and copypaste it to the forum for you. For anyone who had actually read the article you would appear the Fool for it talks about every one of the "Points" you made.
__________________
NEVER
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.