|
Mocker
|
 |
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WestPac
|
|

Mar 31st, 2003, 11:44 PM
Come on Punk, we both know that juries are a mixed lot. After the Defense and Prosecutor get through with interviewing them, its a grab bag of assholes which neither side is entirely happy with. A lawyer doesn't even require a reason to dismiss a possible juror, well up to his quota of dismissals anyway, and only after that is he required to show prior bias.
Whats the point of that question? Of course a jury should decide. Its his constitutional righ
|
|
|
|