
Jan 16th, 2006, 12:07 PM
Kulterkamp, I would like responses to the following(since you chose to ignore them, which to me signifies you feel stupified by them):
"Did you know they often allow child molesters to adopt? Yes, it's true. When going through the process of adopting a child they do absolutely no background check, drug tests or anything else like that. I hope you can recognize the sarcasm in that. "
"They aren't facts, remember? And also, my response was pretty much the result that the studies you yourself posted suggested. I find that hilarious. You're the one arguing against facts. I'll post it again so you can revel in it:
"In speculating about the reasons for the higher level of psychological problems, the researchers offered the commonly proposed theory that social discrimination could be a source of the problems." (That's from one of your posted articles, in case you forget)
Here's what i said, in case you forget:
"And even if they do, what chances are there it has anything to do with their sexual orientation? Why can't it just be societal constraints" "
Okay thanks, here's responses to yours:
"What conditioning? Do you believe each homosexual is conditioned by his parents to be a homosexual?"
You're obviously stupid, learn to read. I was talking about Emotional oversensitivity and how genders are socially conditioned to have different emotional responses to various situations.
"We'll never go away -- not in my lifetime, and not in the lifetime of my kids; you'll die before you see your ideals factualized, in the very least. We are losing the war, but we will still make you uncomfortable because we hate you. "
I don't know what you're talking about, I'm not made uncomfortable by anything. Especially not people who hate gays. And I don't know why you keep targetting this at me like I have any personal interest in the topic, or like I'm taking sides. I just think your argument is illogical and stupid and am having fun tearing it apart.
P.S. I hope your kids turn out gay, and they probably will. It's been found that children with homophobic parents often end up gay.
"Do you really tink that it is a matter of simply random kids becoming homosexuals, and just a slight alteration with how we are raised? Ridiculous. What is your proof? "
Um, I don't believe that necessarily but that can have an effect, sure. There's so much that can happen before that that will influence it. These aren't necessarily even my ideas I'm quoting, these are well-founded psychological ideas. Maybe try looking up, "Psychosexual development"?
Imagine somebody who actually knows about psychology taking part in a conversation like this. Madness.
"If you want, please put the relevant points in much shorter ways."
See towards the very top. Especially the part about adoption agencies requiring drug tests and background tests. Because, despite what your insane punile mind would like to imagine, they don't just give children out to drug addicts.
Dumbass.
I'd really like a response to that, if you can. I'm sure it just tears apart your universe though, considering it essentially undermines every single point you've made.
Also, what about the point with straight people being drug addicts? Are they still allowed to have kids? You never responded to that. I wonder why.
But in all seriousness, it's obvious our debate is over. you refuse to answer any of the serious questions and instead attempt to focus on the weakest link to avoid them, which to me signifies you feel you've already lost. This debate is now pointless, we've already won. You've lost. We are obviously too smart for you, or maybe you're too stupid for us? Either way, good day. I'm glad we were able to crush all of your pitiful ideas that had such a weak intellectual backing.
To be completely honest, the only reason I even want to see you try to respond to the above is to see you squirm, so if you want to indulge me.. please. It's always nice to see how people respond to things they fear.
|