Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KevinTheOmnivore
Yes, this is clearly in line with the liberal media's agenda.
Step 1: Force French press agency to lie about photo
Step 2: Publish said photo
Step 3: Catch mistake
Step 4: Print correction of said mistake, thus making themselves look foolish
Those bastards. Who do those hippie "tossers" think they are????
|
No, more like:
French try to feed shocking photography of events as fact;
Someone who knows ANYTHING about ordinance sees a large artillery round and laughs when they say it is an unexploded part of the missile;
NY Times is forced to print a retraction because it is so obvious to anyone who has ever been around munitions.
But I would not expect a liberal to have served in the military and have any concept of what different rounds look like, or to have any clue about ordinance. I am no expert but it is kind of cute that an entirely in-tact artillery round is being passed off as an unexploded part of a missile -- I personally laughed at the photo. I am no Red Legs (again, I would not expct a liberal to be familiar with any military slang) but I can tell the difference between an artillery round and a missile (in most obvious cases such as this).
You think that they would have been able to pass that off for long?
Somewhere a 13B would have seen the photo and passed it around to his soldiers laughing at the mistake, sending a little email to the journalists saying: "Are you for real?"
But! Again, I would not expect a liberal to know what a 13B is, or to believe that anyone is capable of objective analysis of the media.
Liberals are not notorious for their military service, discipline, or dedication to ... anything (?!?).
Threaded Mode