Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Mar 27th, 2006, 02:40 PM       
Me personally? I think they have a right to a jury trial for a number of reasons.

No statement has ben made about how soon they could get their military tribunal. Some of them have been their four years and have had no access to a lawyer. We have already released some folks we said were totally innocent, which means any of these guys could be. The ones who the case is totally cut and dried should have gone up before a tribunal a long time ago. Holding people indeffinitely without charge is very bad, not just for these folks but for the united states. Deciding any bunch of people have no definied rights (not no rights, but no definition of what their rights may be, human or otherwise) is a very bad precedent to set.

Also, and I know I'm in a minority on this, I don't think we are at war. I don't think you can be at war on tactic. You want to say this is war, take all the Afghanis there (a place we might have legitimtely been at war with) and make them POWs. Everyone else should get a trial. No matter what they may have done (and where we have evidence they should be severely punished). Keeping people like animals in cge and leaving it up to future administrations to do something about is shameful.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.