|
Legislacerator
|
 |
Join Date: May 2002
Location: HELL, where all hot things are
|
|

Aug 31st, 2007, 04:07 PM
I'd imagine that would mean marriage in general. I know that Ron Paul personally opposes gay marriage, but he believes that an amendment to the Constitution would be inappropriate and an abuse of federal power. on the same note, this would mean that state governments would be free to interpret gay marriage as they saw fit.
as far as taxes go, I'd imagine that, keeping in line with his stance of limited federal power, corporate and state income taxes would remain unaffected. I'm sure that the government would also cut defense spending and raise tariffs to help make up the difference. some of his other ideas seem a little out there for me ;<
|
__________________
I could just scream
|
|
|