Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
punkgrrrlie10 punkgrrrlie10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
punkgrrrlie10 is probably a spambot
Old May 22nd, 2003, 08:12 PM       
The only problem with eliminating limited liability in my eyes is that shareholders aren't responsible for business decisions that are proposed for the most part. Most number in the thousands for the bigger corporations and they vote their proxies to a proxy agent and the board of directors decides what insurance to take out and what business policies to implement. It's a democratic process.

Eliminating limited liability basically does away with the entire purpose of incorporation. By making shareholders liable you basically destroy alot of incentives for investment and the risk-taking that makes businesses flourish. You don't want to scare away innovation.

As far as corporate malfeasance, there are ways to "pierce the corporate veil" in order to hold individuals liable who may be responsible for fraud, etc. that are in place. That's one of the jobs of the SEC.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.