Quote:
Originally Posted by dextire
So, you're saying a game can only be considered fine art if it's mainstream?
|
I think what he is saying is that just to few games can actually be
called up for consideration as art and the ones that could be are mostly indie games that the vast majority of the population dont know and/or care about therefore the category of games as a whole cant be called art. Which I can agree with because to few games can actually be considered as art, by myself or anyone being realistic about the subject, but does that really define the category? Goes along with...
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougClayton4231
...I honestly cannot see people looking back at 80-90% of all the videogames ever made and think "Art".
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug
Pac-Man, Pong, and other Atari era shit will probably be in a gallery one day.
|
A gallery or a history museum? Like I said before I dont think you can really compare games as an art to things like paintings or sculptures. At least not from the perspective of the user/viewer/appreciator. You dont see books or movies in a gallery.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug
I just don't expect Modern Warfare to go along with it.
|
Right. Modern Warfare is part of the lump of games I consider not lending themselves to the argument that games are (or at least can be) an art form. While it is a fun game there really isnt anything creative about it or the way you interact with it.