Well... God cannot be argued to either exist because 'existing' is a term which applies to logically quantifiable subjects. Thusly, anything that cannot be argued to exist or not is filed under 'irrelevant' which is very very close to "nonexistent" but not exactly.
My belief in this however (or Ziggys, I'd guess), does not stop me from furthering the argument along a line I do not strictly follow myself. Besides, this matter we're discussing here does not tie in with the onotological argument and/or anyone's belief in god; It ties in with one's belief in Jesus' sayings, and apparently one's capacity for hypocritical behaviour. It is a moral issue, a social issuem ultimately not an ontological philosophical issue so I do not see the harm in persuing it regardless of my heathen nature.
I would appreciate it if you would not question the first argument of this post in this thread. If you insist on more information on what I am saying, or (more likely) fervently desire to oppose it, start a new thread.
You said a job. They are getting paid after all. If they weren't, I wouldn't be discussing this at all.
And thank you for insulting me. It's always nice to be reminded where you are.
Threaded Mode