|
=======
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NA
|
|

Jul 17th, 2003, 12:33 PM
The idea of a centered "Big Bang" is inadequate, because it would either place all of the matter in the universe in one place prior to some big action or it would assume that everything was created from nothing, which would violate the rules I learned in 6th grade Physical Science class.
I prefer to think of the previous state of the universe as a homogenous field of particles (all of them) at uniform density... perfectly balanced and wonderfully boring... upset by that ol' prime motion (s.) I don't particularly believe in what the pre-bang "chaos" term connotates. Maybe "order" would be more suitable, though our current state is just as orderly, just harder to predict.
If the original homogenous field were infinite, and our universe consisting of a subset of those particles, it would be safe to assume that each upset particle that our universe contains would be drawn back to it's original position by the gravity of the infinitely larger, ordered set. If matter is not infinite, eventually all the whole set would be involved in our universe.
|
__________________
mburbank~ Yes, okay, fine, I do know what you meant, but why is it not possible for you to get through a paragraph without making all the words cry?
How can someone who obviously thinks so much of their ideas have so little respect for expressing them? How can someone who so yearns to be taken seriously make so little effort?!
|
|
|