Quote:
Originally Posted by ItalianStereotype
Kevin- you need an example? How about the 10,000 liters of anthrax that remain unaccounted for?
|
You mean the anthrax reported in 96, 97??? Even if they REALLY had this anthrax in 1997 (which has been debated), Anthrax has roughly a shelf life of THREE years, under IDEAL storage conditions. If Iraq had anywhere NEAR the kind of infrastructure that could maintain said anthrax, the inspection teams WOULD'VE found it....
Quote:
How about the nerve gases that he has threatened to coat roads and bridges with?
|
Where have you seen this? This has only been reported, to my understanding, by Fox News. Sorry if I remain cynical....
Quote:
Also, Bill Clinton was not exactly a shining beacon of foreign policy. He sure as hell didn't stick to his guns in Somalia.
|
Scott Ritter went before a REPUBLICAN House and pleaded for the continuation of inspections. It wasn't just Clinton who stopped caring, it was the entire government, for the most part.
Look, we've all been back and forth over this on the politics board. We all know where each other stand on it. That's not the issue. What I can't understand is how you can simplify the war. All war is terrible, whether you feel it's necessary or not. People die every day. But that doesn't mean it isn't terrible when they die.