Features

TheCoolinator · #1

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Leader

The idea was that they were providing humanitarian aid, and the article you linked to even mentioned that those funds were sent during a cease fire.

Do you really believe that? Or are you just pretending so we can continue this banter? And you don't think any of those funds were used for arms, bombs, or other devices?

The Leader · #2

Didn't see the first four words of that post, did ya? Doesn't really seem like I'm expressing my own opinion when I write like that, does it? Would you like another rhetorical question?

And could you post a link to the Pakistan vs India thing or tell me where I can find more information?

The Leader · #3

Dude, you're going to get him in trouble.

Colonel Flagg · #4

YOU GIVE OUT HOPE LIKE IT WAS CANDY IN YOUR POCKET!

The Leader · #5

If you really want to but I'm more interested in the LTTE being used as a tool of Pakistan and India. All I can find about it is opposite what you wrote, that Pakistan blamed India for a LTTE attack. Is that what you were referencing?

TheCoolinator · #6

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Leader

If you really want to but I'm more interested in the LTTE being used as a tool of Pakistan and India. All I can find about it is opposite what you wrote, that Pakistan blamed India for a LTTE attack. Is that what you were referencing?

Hmm,

I may have gotten them switched. Eitherway, if you want to go after the crux of the issue just research which faction (Nation State) defended the Tamil Tigers when they were being attacked by the Sri Lankan government. Defense of outlaws (terrorists) is usually a smoking gun or red flag in the world of covert activities. This usually points to who is really backing them.

If my memory serves me right it was a Human Rights person in the UN but I don't know what nation he was working for.

The Leader · #7

What do think the state sponsorship in the Mumbai attacks was, other than Pakistan training and equipping Lashkar-e-Taiba?

The Leader · #8

You're the idiot!

Pentegarn · #9

When you refer to anti abortion terrorism, are you talking about when they murder abortion doctors? Or have they done other things I am unaware of (entirely through never researching the subject) like blow up abortion clinics?

Zhukov · #10

Well I have heard somewhere about an abortion clinic being blown up, I think. Or was it a pipe bomb in the letter box?

Fathom Zero · #11

Colonel Flagg · #12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pentegarn

When you refer to anti abortion terrorism, are you talking about when they murder abortion doctors? Or have they done other things I am unaware of (entirely through never researching the subject) like blow up abortion clinics?

I know they routinely picket outside on public property, speaking sharply to those individuals who would enter the establishment. Is that terrorism?

(BTW, the whack-job in Kansas didn't get what he deserved.

)

The Leader · #13

Kill doctors/nurses, blow up clinics, burn clinics down, ect. It's fun for the whole family.

TheCoolinator · #14

I don't know how many times I have to say this....but.....

The word terrorism is just a label of demonization. The establishment is attempting to make every little infraction "terrorism". It's incremental behavior modification.

Remember when everything was communism this and communism that? Don't you see how they create enemy images to fool the public into believing that there is a real threat all the while stealing trillions of dollars in military contracts, bankers / insurance bailouts, and clamping down on civil liberties?

Yes, terrorism is a tactic. Yes, some are real terrorists, but most if not all of the time those "terrorists" are either provoked,....duped,....funded,...or completely synthetic. Funded by public-private partnerships.

Colonel Flagg · #15

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCoolinator

I don't know how many times I have to say this....but.....

How about "none"?

Zhukov · #16

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCoolinator

I don't know how many times I have to say this....but.....

The word terrorism is just a label of demonization. The establishment is attempting to make every little infraction "terrorism". It's incremental behavior modification.

Remember when everything was communism this and communism that? Don't you see how they create enemy images to fool the public into believing that there is a real threat all the while stealing trillions of dollars in military contracts, bankers / insurance bailouts, and clamping down on civil liberties?

That's right, I mean people say that Stalin killed millions of his own people, but it's pretty obvious to anyone that looks beyond the hype that the so called facts are all just put there by the CIA and stuff like that. If you ask a real Russian that was alive during the 80s and early 90s they will tell you he wasn't such a bad guy.

Ant10708 · #17

Russians <3 Stalin

Dimnos · #18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zhukov

If you ask a real Russian that was alive during the 80s and early 90s they will tell you he wasn't such a bad guy.

And they didnt even get to enjoy the awesome health benefits of the GULAG system.

TheCoolinator · #19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dimnos

And they didnt even get to enjoy the awesome health benefits of the GULAG system.

At least we'll get a chance to experience it here in the USA.

Obamacare AKA Insurance Bailout will be appointing callous board members AKA death panels so AIG, AETNA, and METLIFE can continue to deny our care. I mean we wouldn't want it to affect their bottomline.....that would be un-American.

Colonel Flagg · #20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coolie

Obamacare AKA Insurance Bailout will be appointing callous board members AKA death panels so AIG, AETNA, and METLIFE can continue to deny our care.

No. I won't do it. Someone else take a turn.

Dimnos · #21

Coolinator, who is the Somerton Man?

TheCoolinator · #22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dimnos

Coolinator, who is the Somerton Man?

No idea but he was definitely poisoned.

Colonel Flagg · #23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dimnos

who is the Somerton Man?

I can't believe over 60 years later and no one has any idea either who he is, or what the mysterious letters represent.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coolie

he was definitely poisoned.

[emphasis mine]

If you're definite, then you must know why. Otherwise, there is still a possibility of either accidental death or suicide.

So, why was he poisoned?

EDIT: I assume from the context that you refer to a deliberate act by another individual or individuals, i.e. murder. If you are just saying that he ingested poison, which could also have either been accidental, or in order to effect his own death, then yes, you are probably correct.