Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
theapportioner theapportioner is offline
Mocker
theapportioner's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
theapportioner is probably a spambot
Old Apr 25th, 2003, 05:01 PM       
Quote:
but EVEN when someone like Al Sharpton or Farrakahn (both extremists and ethnocentrics in my book) stand up representing themselves by their ethnicity, it's not okay for someone to respond with slurs and invoke the topic "slavery" to an unrelated debate, right? this is no different to me as a jew with comments about the holocaust and my "victim complex" .
Last I remember, I don't recall any al-Qaeda sympathizing Muslims posting here. If anyone did, they'd get what's coming to them too, I'm sure. Point is, you have no basis on which to suggest this double standard among the people here. Your perception of this double standard comes from a gross generalization of what you perceive to be the contradictory behavior of the "left"; making these gross generalizations is something you do quite eagerly, and intentionally, whenever it comes to any ethnicity other than yours.

And if you want to bring up that ANSWER thread, don't, because the very first thing I said about ANSWER was how awful it was that they promoted anti-semitic rhetoric.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Sethomas Sethomas is offline
Antagonistic Tyrannosaur
Sethomas's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Abstruse Caboose
Sethomas is probably a spambot
Old Apr 25th, 2003, 05:18 PM       
I don't have to know anything about your religious practices, as the depth to which you present yourself as a shitty human being speaks volumes on how such things really affect you. I still find it hilarious that you can get this riled up and still can't think of anything better to call me than a bigot, when you have provided no evidence that I can be called as such.

I think it's clear that the vox populi of the I-mockery community isn't as adamently left-based as people think it is. The conservative crowd is much larger here now, for better or worse, and the obnoxiously liberal such as Ranxer don't get any slack from the general crowd. The majority here is left of center, but not extremist.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Abcdxxxx Abcdxxxx is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Abcdxxxx is probably a spambot
Old Apr 25th, 2003, 05:38 PM       
Who said anything about the left here? Who said anything about the general i-mockery population? Huh? Is your brain fried or what?

Anyways, as for Seth.......Seems I'm such a shitty human being, all his assumptions and stereotyping MUST have some validation. I mean, It's okay to racially bash someone if they're a shitty human being right?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
The_Rorschach The_Rorschach is offline
Mocker
The_Rorschach's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WestPac
The_Rorschach is probably a spambot
Old Apr 25th, 2003, 05:45 PM       
This will probably earn me the animosity of everyone on this board, but you BOTH sound like snivelling little bitches and I wish you would just shut the fuck up.

This entire thread should be fucking wiped just so noone else has to read it.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
AChimp AChimp is offline
Resident Chimp
AChimp's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: The Jungles of Borneo
AChimp is probably a real personAChimp is probably a real person
Old Apr 25th, 2003, 05:48 PM       
We should ALL go to Loveline and post in the Circle Jerk thread. It will make us all feel better after having to read this bland argument over who called who a ****** and said the other was a Jew.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Sethomas Sethomas is offline
Antagonistic Tyrannosaur
Sethomas's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Abstruse Caboose
Sethomas is probably a spambot
Old Apr 25th, 2003, 05:59 PM       
I was referring to Spinster's post, dumbass. It's good to see that quadruple x elevated his imagined attacks to "racial bashing".

Back to the topic, I think that we haven't seen as much terrorism as we were made to expect because 11.09.01 was meant to be a large assault in a vacuum, not the first strike in a planned-out string of events. It was expected to usher in a change after which others would be inspired to take smaller-scale strikes, kind of like how white suburbanites started mailing anthrax to each other. The individual was expected to take over for Al Qaeda, which knew that it would be taking huge risks to continue in organized movements. The problem with that thinking was that individual discontentment generally doesn't strike out without a more consolidated catalyst. That is, while would-be terrorists may have smiled at the fall of the WTC, they're luckily too chickenshit or lazy to imitate it. Count your blessings.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Abcdxxxx Abcdxxxx is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Abcdxxxx is probably a spambot
Old Apr 25th, 2003, 06:39 PM       
except it will be another seven fucking years before anyone knows for sure...and maybe by then we'll have reclassified hundreds of criminal acts that should have been seen as terror related in the first place and wake the fuck up. or in seth's case...shut the fuck up.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Sethomas Sethomas is offline
Antagonistic Tyrannosaur
Sethomas's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Abstruse Caboose
Sethomas is probably a spambot
Old Apr 25th, 2003, 06:52 PM       
If you have to make a special mention of me(), you could at least be more original than that.

What I think will be more surprising, and more unlikely to be revealed any time soon, is how many of those arrests and violations of the Geneva Convention or the Bill of Rights will be found completely superfluous.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
ziggytrix ziggytrix is offline
Mocker
ziggytrix's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i come from the water
ziggytrix is probably a spambot
Old Apr 25th, 2003, 09:22 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Rorschach
random typoes and grammarical errors in order to make him seem more human.
you're gonna pay for that one.
__________________
BOYCOTT SIGNATURES!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
ziggytrix ziggytrix is offline
Mocker
ziggytrix's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i come from the water
ziggytrix is probably a spambot
Old Apr 25th, 2003, 09:54 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abcdxxxx
hundreds of criminal acts that should have been seen as terror related
i must have missed another thread... what are you referring to here?
__________________
BOYCOTT SIGNATURES!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Abcdxxxx Abcdxxxx is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Abcdxxxx is probably a spambot
Old Apr 26th, 2003, 12:11 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Rorschach
you BOTH sound like snivelling little bitches and I wish you would just shut the fuck up..
This coming from a guy who had a Nazi alias on here for "off color" humor in hopes someone would give a shit....Ror, you're disqualified.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
kellychaos kellychaos is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Where I Started But In A Different Place
kellychaos is probably a spambot
Old Apr 26th, 2003, 10:19 AM        Re: Why haven't there been more terrorist attacks lately?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyclad Lad
Or any of note, for that matter...
If you believe the U.S. government's estimate that there are some 5,000 Al Qaeda members or A-Q sympathisers in the country (and I don't, but there are surely still a good many), why haven't they done a thing lately? Is the security in America really THAT good?
Well, since the Clinton administration basically let the support for the intelligence community go to hell during his 8-year tenure, maybe going from zero to something IS an improvement that is THAT observable. Scare the right influential people enough and you can get the money and support to make things happen in short order. I'm cerainly not saying that the terrorist threat does not still exist but I would guess that it has diminished somewhat.
__________________

Wherever you go, there you are.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
The_Rorschach The_Rorschach is offline
Mocker
The_Rorschach's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WestPac
The_Rorschach is probably a spambot
Old Apr 26th, 2003, 01:44 PM       
Er no, ABC, if you bothered to read any news on issues outside Irael, you would know by the pict that was David Duke. He's a conservative whom seems to think the Republican Party is an SS holdout in the US.

His real life personality seemed like character material so I toyed with it for awhile. You really need to let things go, what was that, a year ago?
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Abcdxxxx Abcdxxxx is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Abcdxxxx is probably a spambot
Old Apr 26th, 2003, 04:48 PM       
I already made a David Duke reference earlier in this post dumb shit...

All I recall is you made some posts under a Nazi themed alias .... I never bothered to call you on it the first time, so believe me there's nothing to get over... but I sure as hell don't forget.... and your "hey maaan lighten up" attitude doesn't cut it. It was stupid, but the most offensive thing about it was it's lack of humor.... pay attention the next time Burbank gives a lecture on "context". i would have loved to laugh with you...lord knows i was tired of laughing AT you.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
The_Rorschach The_Rorschach is offline
Mocker
The_Rorschach's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WestPac
The_Rorschach is probably a spambot
Old Apr 27th, 2003, 03:50 PM       
Well, I must have missed the reference. I did a FIND for David Duke in this thread and only my post came up, but it doesn't matter.

As for my attitude, you're misreading it. The emphasis was on Duke himself, and his fucked up views. I made maybe a dozen posts with him, most of them just posting the WW2 German national anthem. I feel pretty confident in saying I wasn't using the account for Jew baiting or hating, and it certainly wasn't created with that in mind. Yeah, it was a bad joke, but it was also a brief one, and thats why I say get over it. I mean Christ, thats pretty fucking petty.

I also posted as "Bob" Dobberson for awhile. Who gives a fuck? Humour isn't my strong suit, notice I don't even pretend to use it any longer.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Sethomas Sethomas is offline
Antagonistic Tyrannosaur
Sethomas's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Abstruse Caboose
Sethomas is probably a spambot
Old Apr 27th, 2003, 08:47 PM       
Actually, I thought the amount of time you spent on a rebuttal to my clearly facetious statement that France won the American Revolution, was utterly hilarious.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
The_Rorschach The_Rorschach is offline
Mocker
The_Rorschach's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WestPac
The_Rorschach is probably a spambot
Old Apr 27th, 2003, 08:53 PM       
I find half the shit you post rather amusing myself, but only because of its pretension. Glad I could throw a laugh back your way.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.