Existence?

[davinxtk]

Originally Posted by WICKED

It will come as a surprise to anyone whose read my things that I will try to be less of a douche in this one.

That really really didn't help us this time around.

I fucking hate you.

[kellychaos]

Originally Posted by Sethomas

Pure Darwinism is based on the fact that nature has no direction.

I will acquiese to a certain amount of free will (for lack of a better term) although I would insist that existence must take place within a static set of parameters regardless of whether you know the rules or not. To insist that you do would be high vanity.

[kahljorn]

I prefer considering it like liquid, or water in fact that water has no innate 'direction', it just merely satisfies it's ennui by compliance with outside forces. Makes sense, no?
Wouldn't assuming that it has parameters in the first place be rather vain?
And being able to use or understand what we were talking about could easily be attained through psychology, sociology or nearly any invasive science, Seth, you could even understand it through anatomy if you were so inclined.

[Pub Lover]

Will to power?

[kahljorn]

93 to Power. Did you know 'they' say will and love are the same thing? The same word? ISN'T THAT JUST STRANGE?

[davinxtk]

...atomic batteries to power


turbines to speed...

[kellychaos]

42

[Sethomas]

FUCK YOU. I wouldn't necessarily care if a major hollywood movie hadn't been made, but one has been, so FUCK YOU.

[kellychaos]

I read the books when I was about 14, fucker.

P.S. Granted, I didn't get all the jokes at the time ... but still.